Brain Enema of a Savage Mind

Today marks 75 years since beer was once again made legal in this country.  After a few dark years of underground boozing and the rise to power of the mafia, the government wised up, at least momentarally, to repeal Prohibition and once again allow booze to flow freely!

So lift up a pint and celebrate 75 years of legalized beer!  Here’s to you beer, and 75 more years of deliciousness!

Yes, the title of this post is sarcasm.

Scooter Libby’s sentence is being commuted. A man who has been found guilty of all kinds of misuse of power is now being freed by the master of misused power. The only difference is Bush isn’t doing anything illegal, just really stupid. At this point I think his own political party might be the group that hates him the most as he is single handedly destroying the GOP’s chance of winning the next election. Between him and a vice president who can’t decide what branch of the government he wants to belong to this day there is no public support left for the GOP. If they have any chance of salvaging what is left of their party they need to be the ones to step up to the plate and pry the madman from his thrown.

With politics being all about the status quo these days we know that’s not going to happen. It’ll be business as usual, and I’ll just keep hoping that nothing else goes to hell in the next year and a half.

There’s been an outcry on LiveJournal as of late due to certain liberties being stripped.  In an overzealous reaction to a barely literate organization LiveJournal has suspended numerous accounts and communities for having keywords such as rape or incest.  No research or investigation was done.  Numerous of these groups were support communites for survivors of rape and other horrific abuses.  Even more absurd a literary group discussing Nabokov’s “Lolita” was banned.  I understand the legal pressures that they may feel.  Shutting down groups that preach abusive behavior is one thing, but to go after any group merely by doing a keyword search is draconian, ignorant, and abusive.  It’s sad that in this climate of declining liberties that places that once stood for the open sharing of ideas now contribute to the supression of a liberty that is enshrined at the very foundation of this country.  That right to express our beliefs, and the ability to feel safe in open discourse is something that makes this nation very unique.  Freedom of speech and the press are not given liberties even in many First World nations.  Many groups are battling with our national leaders to preserve these rights, now we face attacks by the private sector whose very business model was built upon these rights.

It might not seem like such a big deal now, but if given just an inch, next time they’ll take a foot.  Left unchecked it could lead to the censorship and banning of any group that could possibly offend any other member.  Where do you draw the line?  I’m sure I’ll continue to post to my LiveJournal account about the more mundane things, but it has lost its appeal as a place where I can express anything other than every day events such as letting people know about a get together.  I really hope that a public outcry by the massive LiveJournal user base will help them rethink their policies.  At the very least investigate claims, examine their merit before jumping the gun and banning people because of a potentially offensive keyword.  SixApart (the parent company of LiveJournal) could take this as a chance to stand up and buck the trend of ever increasing regulation of internet speech.  They could raise the banner of open dialog between peers and stand up to those who would oppress one of our most basic, and yet most unique of rights.

Well the idiots in the state government are at it again, attempting to regulate every tiny detail of life in the name of public safety.  This newest effort comes from New York State Sen. Carl Kruger.  In a wonderfuly idiotic effort to protect people from their own stupidity he is introducing legislation that would ban the use of electronic devices while crossing the street.  That’s right, if you cross the street while cranking up the volume on your iPod you could be subject to 100$ fine.  His motivation for this?  Well his publically stated motivation is that three people in his district have been killed while stepping in to traffic while using some electronic device.  Think about it, these people walked in to traffic - I don’t care what they were doing at the time, if you don’t have enough common sense to look both ways before walking out in to the middle of the street then you’re just proving natural selection is hard at work.

His real motivations, one would assume, are like that of most politicians these days: an attempt to justify their seat in office.  They can’t find ways to help battle unemployment, homelessness, rampant drug abuse, or violent crimes, so they rally around some stupidly short sighted and moronic piece of legislation while touting how they are going to help save lives.  The fact that our legislative body is going to waste its time over such legislation, taking away from any chance they might focus on an issue that really matters, is a crime against the citizenry of this state.  Perhaps the greater crime is we keep electing these officials in to office.  We don’t smack them on the wrists and tell them no like a grabby child in a candy store.  Instead we spoil them by letting them get away with such assinine measures.

As for the people who are walking in to traffic - again, if you don’t have the common sense that tells you walking in to a street without looking first isn’t a good idea then there are far deeper problems here than the fact you were gazing longingly at your phone waiting for that next text message.   While the loss of life is always tragic, I am constantly amazed how much could be prevented by common sense.  If someone is not self-aware enough topractice common safety measures then all the legislation in the world isn’t going to save them.

Hopefully this piece of legislation will never see the light of day - though in todays fear mongering climate I have no doubt it’ll find its way in to law.